| 翻訳と辞書 |
| British Columbia (PSERC) v. BCGSEU ： ウィキペディア英語版 |
British Columbia (Public Service Employee Relations Commission) v British Columbia Government Service Employees' Union
''British Columbia (Public Service Employee Relations Commission) v British Columbia Government Service Employees' Union'' () 3 S.C.R. 3, – called ''Meiorin'' for short – is a Supreme Court of Canada case that created a unified test to determine if a violation of human rights legislation can be justified as a bona fide occupational requirement (BFOR).
== Background ==
Before ''Meiorin'', Human Rights violations were treated in one of two ways; either as ''direct discrimination'' pursuant to the analysis in ''Ontario Human Rights Commission v. Borough of Etobicoke'' () 1 S.C.R. 202, or as ''adverse effects discrimination'' pursuant to the analysis in ''O'Malley v. Simpson-Sears'' () 2 S.C.R. 536. Academic writing deeply criticized this bifurcation of analysis as arbitrary and unhelpful in protecting equality rights. With the Meiorin case, the court decided to confront this criticism and refashion the analysis.
抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア（Wikipedia）』
■ウィキペディアで「British Columbia (Public Service Employee Relations Commission) v British Columbia Government Service Employees' Union」の詳細全文を読む
スポンサード リンク
| 翻訳と辞書 : 翻訳のためのインターネットリソース |
Copyright(C) kotoba.ne.jp 1997-2016. All Rights Reserved.
|
|